Home
History of TERRC
Planning Permission TERRC
Waste Management        License TERRC

Environmental Info TERRC

Waste Information

MARAD Contracts Factsheet

News

Press Releases - ABLE

Press Releases - MARAD

Press Releases - OTHER

Emails & Letters received

Photos

Links

 

 


TERRC/MARAD Permissions & Licenses

PLANNING TIMESCALE/ACTIVITIES

  • On 27th August 1996 ABLE applied to the TDC (Teesside Development Corporation) for planning permission to develop the former Laings shipyard/dry dock into a state of the art recycling facility. ABLE renamed the site TERRC (Teesside Environmental Reclamation & Recycling Centre) which describes the objective.
  • Included with the Planning Application was an Environmental Assessment covering all intended activities which included to receive and recycling marine structures together with a Regulation 48 Assessment in accordance with the Habitats Directive (please see TERRC environmental information).
  • When ABLE submitted the application, ABLE had included ships and a list of various types of marine structures in the narrative but the TDC suggested (and ABLE agreed to change) that the description just state ‘Marine Structures’ as this would encompass all types of marine structures including ships, platforms etc. This was done as it covered the objective.
  • On 6th May 1997 at Hartlepool Town Hall, a presentation was given to an open audience, which included Statutory Consultees, Members of Hartlepool Borough Council and Members of the Public, showing the development and the potential receival and recycling of the Brent Spar – this gained local support and approval.
  • Planning permission was approved for all activities on the 1st October 1997.
  • ABLE discussed and received confirmation from Hartlepool Borough Council (HBC) that the planning permission covered ships delivering cars in 1999. This was based on a large car delivery ship per day. This contract was underway during 1999 and 2000 without any significant disturbance to the local environment.
  • ABLE discussed and received written confirmation from HBC that the planning permission did cover decommissioning of ships under ‘Marine Structures’ in February 2003.
  • ABLE have undertaken receival and recycling of marine structures at TERRC every year since 1996 with no problems or complaints from anyone, including HBC or Members of the Public.
  • During the eight years of occupation there has been significant monitoring of the local environment by third parties including Durham University, INCA and various consultants. There has been NO significant detrimental effect on the local environment due to activities at TERRC.
  • In the original planning permission there was a condition that human activity could not be undertaken within 500 metres of the mudflats to avoid disturbance to the birds feeding. After five years of operating under a temporary permission that allowed such activities to be undertaken whilst being monitored, it was proven and agreed that the human activity had no significant detrimental effect on the birds and seals, therefore, this condition could and was removed.
  • In the original Planning Permission there was a condition with regard to noise levels to avoid disturbance of birds feeding, after five years of operating under a temporary permission which allowed such activities to be undertaken whilst being monitored, it was agreed that this condition could and was also removed as we had proven that the noise from the activities on TERRC had no significant detrimental effect on the birds and seals.
  • Please see the “TERRC Environmental info page” for full information relating to the environmental assessments etc undertaken at TERRC.

PLANNING FOR WORKS

On the TERRC site there has been shipbuilding activities since 1913, a dry dock since 1970 and decommissioning works on marine structures since 1985 see “History on TERRC”.

TERRC has additional permissions under planning approval 1997 and 2002.

PLANNING FOR BUND “MAIN”

TERRC has planning permission to “Enlarge and Refurbish the Dock”. Approved by TDC 1997.

HBC suggested that the gate is not covered under “Enlarge and Refurbish the Dock”.

ABLE’s legal advice confirmed that it was.

TERRC has planning permission for “Laings Bund”. Approved by TDC 1997.

HBC say that the Bund Application is under dispute only because the Local Authority cannot find a record of the Local Authority writing back to ABLE confirming approval of the information that ABLE submitted in 1998.

The Local Authority never said that the information provided by ABLE was not satisfactory.

The Local Authority has been fully aware of all activities on TERRC since 1995.

The Local Authority has never made any comment stating that they had a problem with either the works or the activities on TERRC until they were approached by FOE (Friends of the Earth) in July 2003.

JUDICIAL REVIEW

There were two Judicial Reviews;

  • Friends of the Earth (FOE) against the Environment Agency (EA) – 8th December 2003

    FOE maintained that the EA had not carried out the correct procedure when they had provided a modification to TERRC Waste Management Licence. This was a procedural matter and the Judge held in favour of FOE, therefore, the Licence ABLE had received the ships under was annulled as from that date. ABLE had to apply for a new Waste Management Licence.

    Note: This action was against the Environment Agency and not Able UK Ltd.

    Three Hartlepool Residents against Hartlepool Borough Council (HBC)

    Instigated by three residents from Hartlepool (Neil Gregan, Stephen Hall and Ben Marley) who acquired legal aid using a firm of solicitors from Birmingham (Public Interest Lawyers) to take HBC to a Judicial Review Hearing on the 15/16th December 2003.

    Note: This action was against Hartlepool Borough Council and not Able UK Ltd.

    Taxpayers had to pay for the costs for their Solicitors via legal aid (a waste of Taxpayer’s money!)

    HBC had to pay for the costs to defend the action (a waste of HBC’s funds!)

    HBC paid circa £3,000 placing an advert in a weekly paper that is produced in the House of Commons to state their position (a waste of HBC’s funds!)

Question 1 for the Judicial Hearing

Is a Ship a Marine Structure?

  • The Judge declared that it was not!!

NOTE:

  • None of the items discussed at the Hearing covered any actual concern regarding the environment or any potential to damage the environment.
  • ABLE have been remediating and recycling marine structures at TERRC since 1985 and there has never been any signs whatsoever of any significant detrimental effect on the local ecology.
  • The EA also confirmed that a Waste Management Licence cannot have the quantity modified if it is on the front of the Licence. Therefore, we understand that a significant number of Waste Management Licences in the UK that had been modified to amend the condition on the front page are also invalid which means a large number of waste management facilities are now operating illegally. Why hasn’t the EA taken action?

SITUATION AS AT 24th August 2006

  • Environmental Impact Statement......Submitted January 2005
  • Environmental Impact Statement.....Updated and re-submitted November 2005
  • Points of Clarification:-
    • Supplementary Document.....Submitted January 2006
    • Supplementary Document.....Submitted May 2006
  • Planning decision...................Imminent

Telephone: +44(0)1642 806080   Fax: +44(0)1642 655655   Email: info@ableuk.com
www.ableuk.com       www.ableshiprecycling.com